4IMSmith
contestada

Vietnam Speech (1965)
Lyndon B. Johnson
. . . Over this war, and all Asia, is the deepening shadow of Communist China. The rulers in Hanoi are urged on by Peking. This is a regime which has destroyed freedom in Tibet, attacked India, and been condemned by the United Nations for aggression in Korea. It is a nation which is helping the forces of violence in almost every continent. The contest in Vietnam is part of a wider pattern of aggressive purpose.

Why are these realities our concern? Why are we in South Vietnam? We are there because we have a promise to keep. Since 1954 every American President has offered support to the people of South Vietnam. We have helped to build, and we have helped to defend. Thus, over many years, we have made a national pledge to help South Vietnam defend its independence. And I intend to keep our promise. To dishonor that pledge, to abandon this small and brave nation to its enemy, and to the terror that must follow, would be an unforgivable wrong.

We are also there to strengthen world order. Around the globe, from Berlin to Thailand, are people whose well-being rests, in part, on the belief that they can count on us if they are attacked. To leave Vietnam to its fate would shake the confidence of all these people in the value of American commitment, the value of America’s word. The result would be increased unrest and instability, and even wider war...

Peace with Honor (1973)
Richard Nixon
...We must recognize that ending the war is only the first step toward building the peace. All parties must now see to it that this is a peace that lasts, and also a peace that heals—and a peace that not only ends the war in Southeast Asia but contributes to the prospects of peace in the whole world.

This will mean that the terms of the agreement must be scrupulously adhered to. We shall do everything the agreement requires of us, and we shall expect the other parties to do everything it requires of them. We shall also expect other interested nations to help insure that the agreement is carried out and peace is maintained....



Which statement best describes these speeches made by President Johnson (1965) and President Nixon (1973) regarding the Vietnam War?
A) Johnson explains the reason for U.S. involvement, while Nixon explains the need to end the war.
B) Johnson says the U.S. should stop their enemies, while Nixon explains why the war should continue.
C) Johnson explains how the U.S. will attack Vietnam, while Nixon explains how Vietnam will attack the U.S.
D) Johnson believes the Vietnamese will attack the U.S., while Nixon believes the U.S. should attack Vietnam.

Respuesta :

Correct answer:  

A) Johnson explains the reason for US involvement, while Nixon explains the need to end the war.

Explanation:

President Lyndon Johnson's words are an illustration of "domino theory."  Domino theory was the idea that the spread of communism in Vietnam would result in other countries in the region falling like dominoes to the influence of communism.  During his administration, after obtaining the Gulf of Tonkin resolution from Congress, President Johnson escalated US involvement in the war and magnified the number of US troops there by hundreds of thousands.  Between 1964 and the end of Johnson's presidency in 1969, US troop levels in Vietnam increased from around 20,000 to over 500,000

Read more about the Gulf of Tonkin resolution on Brainly.com -

https://brainly.com/question/12225803#readmore

President Richard Nixon had instituted a policy of "Vietnamization" in regard to the Vietnam War, which  emphasized that the United States needed to empower South Vietnamese forces to assume more combat duties.  He proposed drawing down US involvement in the war and seeking "peace with honor," as he put it.  By the time that President Nixon and US policy shifted to this sort of policy, it was too late to stave off the victory of the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong forces.  The US eventually withdrew its forces from Vietnam in 1973, and by 1975, Saigon (in South Vietnam) fell to the North Vietnamese communist forces.