According to Chapter 2, ethicists such as Manuel G. Velasquez (2011) argue that whistle-blowing is justified if three conditions are satisfied. One condition is that there is strong evidence that the organization is doing something that is hurting or will hurt other parties. What are the other two conditions? (Select both answers.)

A. The employee has made a serious but unsuccessful attempt to resolve the problem through internal channels.
B. Whistle-blowing is reasonably certain to prevent or stop the wrongdoing.
C. The employee has suffered personal harm as a result of the wrongdoing, such as the loss of a promotion, a substantial decrease in salary, or physical injury.
D. The wrongdoing involves members of a minority group or affects individuals granted specific rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Question

princesstommier2033 princesstommier2033

03-02-2020
English

contestada

According to Chapter 2, ethicists such as Manuel G. Velasquez (2011) argue that whistle-blowing is justified if three conditions are satisfied. One condition is that there is strong evidence that the organization is doing something that is hurting or will hurt other parties. What are the other two conditions? (Select both answers.)

A. The employee has made a serious but unsuccessful attempt to resolve the problem through internal channels.
B. Whistle-blowing is reasonably certain to prevent or stop the wrongdoing.
C. The employee has suffered personal harm as a result of the wrongdoing, such as the loss of a promotion, a substantial decrease in salary, or physical injury.
D. The wrongdoing involves members of a minority group or affects individuals granted specific rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Ken went to a country fair and spent $5 on admission, $6. 50 on games, and $7. 21 on food. If he had $30 before he went to the fair, how much money does he have

Write an equation in general form (Ax+By+C =0) for the line that passes through A(2, 4) and B(11, 8).

The concept of quality is brought about by strict and consistent commitment to certain standards that achieve uniformity of a product in order to satisfy specif

Sarah was 50 1/4 inches tall when she was 12 years old. she was 48 1/2 inches tall when she was 11. how much did she grow during the year?

The concept of quality is brought about by strict and consistent commitment to certain standards that achieve uniformity of a product in order to satisfy specif

Given the lengths of two sides of a triangle. write an inequality to indicate between which two numbers the length of the third side must fall. a.8 and 13. b.11

In triangle OPQ, the measure of angle Q=90°, OQ=33, PO= 65, and QP= 56. What ratio represents the tangent of angle P?

A water tower 30 m tall is located at the top of a hill. From a distance of D = 120 m down the hill it is observed that the angle formed between the top and bas

You buy hats for $20, and sell them for $5 each. What does the graph of the profits look like? A: A curve that goes up B: A line that goes down C: A curve that

The table shows the number of runs earned by two baseball players. Player A Player B 2, 1, 3, 8, 2, 3, 4, 4, 1 1, 4, 5, 1, 2, 4, 5, 5, 10 Find the best measure

JackelineCasarez JackelineCasarez · Answer 1 · 2020-02-04T08:43:59+01:00

Answer:

A). The employee has made a serious but unsuccessful attempt to resolve the problem through internal channels.

B). Whistle-blowing is reasonably certain to prevent or stop the wrongdoing.

Explanation:

As per the given description, the other two conditions that justify the whistle-blowing is demonstrated through options A and B. The first one involves that 'the employee made significant but futile attempt to resolve the conflict through internal channels' that would affect the sentiments of the other parties as the organization is involved in something detrimental and still the preference given by employee to internal channels justifies the whistle-blowing(to halt or critique the wrong action by employee). Another justified reason could be that it is 'logically proven to avert or halt the misdeeds or wrongdoings of the organization' that would help prevent any further damage to other parties.