woodrobert250
contestada

Now that you have read excerpts from the Citizens United
case, think about the role that money plays in politics.
Should corporations and organizations be more or less
restricted in their campaign donations?
Provide an answer of three to four sentences.

Respuesta :

umaizariaz04

Answer:

I think companies and groups should be more restricted in their campaign funding practices. Powerful and wealthy organizations can have too much influence over voters and the voting process. OR I think corporations and organizations should be less restricted in how they spend their money for political purposes. As the Supreme Court ruled in the Citizens United case, groups have the right to use their money to express their opinion. I believe this is protected by the First Amendment.

Explanation:

its on quizlet

anthougo

The Citizens United case shows that money plays a pivotal role in the electoral process.

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010)

Corporations and organizations should remain restricted as they have been in their campaign donations. According to the decisions of the Supreme Court, corporations and organizations cannot be restricted from exercising their First Amendment rights, which bother on free speech.

Thus, the court decisions reversed restrictions on the ability of corporations and organizations to express their opinions through adverting campaigns. And political independent expenditures by corporations, associations, or labor unions that follow the electoral guidelines should never be restricted.

Learn more about campaign donations and the role of money in politics at https://brainly.com/question/2434468

Otras preguntas