Why might the t-test be more useful in actual practice when you are running statistics rather than a z-test? give an example of a situation where you might use each of these and label their pros and cons.

Respuesta :

The t-test might be more useful in actual practice when standard deviation or variance is unknown.

What is a t-test?

The t-test is used to determine how the averages of various data sets differ from one another.

When variance is not provided, the T-test, a particular kind of parametric test, is used to determine how the means of two sets of data differ from one another. When variance is provided, the Z-test indicates a hypothesis test that determines whether the means of two datasets differ from one another.

Example of t-test: If you flip a coin 1,000 times, for instance, you can discover that the outcome is distributed normally over all trials.

Example of z-test: We are conducting research using information gathered from cohorts of students who have taken Elementary Statistics in the past.

T-tests are typically more suitable when addressing issues with small sample sizes, whereas z-tests are suitable for large sample sizes.

Using the t-test for an ordinal variable, their frequency is not even close to a normal distribution, and the arithmetic mean offers an unsuitable measure of location.

Because we frequently don't know the population standard deviation, Z-Tests have this drawback.

Learn more about t-tests here:

https://brainly.com/question/6589776

#SPJ4