Answer:
Explanation:
The IRAC method (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) is commonly used in legal analysis to structure arguments. In the context of copyright infringement related to computer programs in intellectual property (IP) law, the rule could be framed as follows:
**Rule:**
In copyright law, protection extends to original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including computer programs. To establish copyright infringement, a plaintiff must demonstrate ownership of a valid copyright and unauthorized copying of constituent elements of the work that are original.
**Application:**
In the case at hand, the plaintiff should prove ownership of a valid copyright in the computer program and establish that the defendant has copied elements of the program without authorization. This could involve demonstrating substantial similarity between the original program and the allegedly infringing work.
**Conclusion:**
If the plaintiff successfully proves ownership of a valid copyright and unauthorized copying of original elements, the court may find the defendant liable for copyright infringement.
