What is the most significant limitation that carl schurz's work has, as a resource for a historian? he was not an eyewitness to the events he describes. he was too young to be a reliable witness. he was an employee of the government and likely biased against the revolutionaries. he wrote his account about fifty years after the events occurred?

Respuesta :

He wrote his account about fifty years after the events occurred.

The most significant limitation that Carl Schurz's work has as a resource for a historian is that he wrote his account about fifty years after the events occurred.

This was a major limitation because a good eye witness account involves writing events as they unfold. When events are recorded based on how they happen, the accounts are usually more accurate and detailed.

Carl Schurz was a writer and also one of America's elder statesmen. The limitation here lies on the time gap that has existed before the work was recorded.

Read more on https://brainly.com/question/16806340