WANNAG22
contestada

Using the library for the Internet as a resource, locate and watch two different interpretations of the crucible. You may choose to view a film or live play production. Then, compare and contrast how the two interpretations represented the original material? If so, how did it affect your experience as a viewer?
Your answer should be no less than 150 words in length

Respuesta :

I would like to compare these two interpretations of The Crucible: 1) Eric Christ's interpretation and Wade Bradford's interpretation. The main differences between there interpretation are that in the first one you can notice a direct link to Joseph McCarthy whereas the second one represents how the town is filled with hysteria. The second interpretation shows that author believes that the story about a Puritan town in Salem is based on actual events while the first example shows the sensible reference to sort of bias.Hope that helps!
Read more on Brainly.com - https://brainly.com/question/2785242#readmore

Answer:

Explanation:Eric Christ's interpretation: Key points: Direct link to Mc Carthy, easily understood, "Witch Hunt", Realized that it was link to "un-American trials", "statement of unlimited power wielded by apparently  well-meaning albeit paranoid and delusional individuals.

Wade Bradford's interpretation: Key points: Shows no link to Joseph Mc Carthur, believes the facts written were directly about the puritan people in Salen Massachussetes.

Explanation: In the first interpretation there is a strong link to Joseph McCarthy but in the other there is no link. From my point of view, the interpretation that changes the original idea is the second because this play should be understood in the context in which it was written and that was a moment that McCarthysm untied a truly witch hunt in American's society