In the case below, the original source material is given along with a sample of student work. Determine the type of plagiarism

STUDENT VERSION
According to Howard, Barrett, and Frick (2010), in order to make appropriate choices educators must understand the ways in which hiding or showing the identity of participants can impact the interaction that takes place in peer feedback activities. Obscuring the identity of participants in peer feedback "may create a social context where learners feel freer to express varied ideas, and make the task of giving feedback less inhibited" (p. 90).

ORIGINAL VERSION
In a complex task such as creating a website for learning, instructors may want to support the generation of multiple solutions in learners' peer feedback. Anonymity may create a social context where learners feel freer to express varied ideas, and make the task of giving feedback less inhibited. However, teachers need to know just how anonymity impacts the learning dynamic in order to make informed choices about when anonymous configurations are appropriate in peer feedback.

Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?

(A) Word-for-Word plagiarism
(B) Paraphrasing plagiarism
(C) This is not plagiarism

The student version cannot be classified and considered plagiarism because it is more than just paraphrasing the original version, it is an interpretation and explanation. Besides that, the student version present quotation marks for an excerpt from the original version and the authors' names very well referenced, which means the student version is worried about making reference to the original one, rather than just paraphrasing or repeating word-for-word with no references.