jackson1167
contestada

Question 5(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)
Which of these pieces of evidence would be most important for jurors to consider in the case of Snoozer v. Early?
Dibeast has lunch every week with Ms. Snoozer and trains her birds
Dibeast saw the birds on Early's property the day the birds went missing,
Dibeast is an animal control officer who often has to capture Ms. Snoozer's birds.
Dibeast witnessed that Early's cat was trained and well behaved. Need help quick

Respuesta :

Answer:

It is the 4th option! I just  took the test and the 4th option was correct!!

Explanation:

The piece of evidence that would be most important for jurors to consider in the case of Snoozer v. Early is D. Dibeast witnessed that Early's cat was trained and well behaved.

It should be noted that based on the complete information, Susy Snoozer wanted compensation for her missing birds and this is what the case was about.

The piece of evidence that would be most important for jurors to consider in the case of Snoozer v. Early is that Dibeast witnessed that Early's cat was trained and well behaved. In this situation, this will be vital in supporting the claim that the cats didn't kill the birds.

Read related link on:

https://brainly.com/question/15611394

Otras preguntas