Answer:
Wealthy property owners and indebted farmers.
Explanation:
1) Wealthy property owners saw their rights constrained by poorer local majorities. This was based on the idea that the local majority was in the hand of the lower socioeconomic classes and this resulted in friction among the wealthy property owners.
2) Indebted farmers, threatened with the loss of land because of failure to meet tax or mortgage payments, pressed state governments for relief. The indebted farmers expected tax relief or agricultural loan opportunities but instead were now threatened with the loss of land in case they failed to pay taxes or mortgage payments.
This governance issues made the wealthy property owners and indebted farmers agitated leading to conflicts.
