Which best explains the difference between a ball-and-stick model of a chemical compound and a space-filling model?
Ball-and-stick models can show compounds in three dimensions, but space-filling models cannot.
Space-filing models can show compounds in three dimensions, but ball-and-stick models cannot
Ball-and-stick models show the bonds between atoms, but not the relative sizes of atoms. Space-filling models show the
relative sizes of atoms, but not the bonds between atoms.
Space-filling models show the bonds between atoms, but not the relative sizes of atoms. Ball-and-stick models show the
relative sizes of atoms, but not the bonds between atoms.

Respuesta :

Answer:

Ball-and-stick models show the bonds between atoms, but not the relative sizes of the atoms. Space-filling models show the relative sizes of atoms, but not the bonds between atoms.

Explanation:

Chemically, it is hard to understand the complex structure and shapes of the atoms and molecules. For better understanding, scientists have different models that help show the molecules in different prospects. For example, ball-and-stick and space-filling models.

The ball-and-stick model shows the three-dimensional arrangement of atoms and bonds. This model has a limitation that the identification of atoms requires a key to color representations. This model also does not show the relative size of atoms.

The space-filling model shows a three-dimensional arrangement as well as the relative size between atoms. Bonding between atoms can sometimes be difficult to distinguish in this model.

Answer:

C

Explanation:

egde2020