Which of the following is true under the Restatement of Contracts, Section 16, regarding the claim of Charles that he should be able to avoid the contract involving Tessa because he was intoxicated?

A.Contracts of an intoxicated person are voidable by the intoxicant if the other party had reason to know that because of the intoxicatedperson's condition, that person was unable to understand the nature and consequences of the transaction or was unable to act in a reasonable manner in relation to the transaction
B. Contracts of an intoxicated person are void if the other party had reason to know that because of the intoxicated person's condition, that person was unable to understand the nature and consequences of the transaction or was unable to act in a reasonable manner in relation to the transaction.
C. Contracts of an intoxicated person are enforceable because a person should be bound by his or her actions.
D. Contracts of an intoxicated person are void only if it can be proven that the other party was involved in encouraging the abuse of alcohol by the intoxicated person.E. Contracts of an intoxicated person are voidable by the intoxicant only if it can be proven that the other party was involved in encouraging the abuse of alcohol by the intoxicated person.

Question

03-03-2020
Law

contestada

Which of the following is true under the Restatement of Contracts, Section 16, regarding the claim of Charles that he should be able to avoid the contract involving Tessa because he was intoxicated?

A.Contracts of an intoxicated person are voidable by the intoxicant if the other party had reason to know that because of the intoxicatedperson's condition, that person was unable to understand the nature and consequences of the transaction or was unable to act in a reasonable manner in relation to the transaction
B. Contracts of an intoxicated person are void if the other party had reason to know that because of the intoxicated person's condition, that person was unable to understand the nature and consequences of the transaction or was unable to act in a reasonable manner in relation to the transaction.
C. Contracts of an intoxicated person are enforceable because a person should be bound by his or her actions.
D. Contracts of an intoxicated person are void only if it can be proven that the other party was involved in encouraging the abuse of alcohol by the intoxicated person.E. Contracts of an intoxicated person are voidable by the intoxicant only if it can be proven that the other party was involved in encouraging the abuse of alcohol by the intoxicated person.

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Wally is a planetologist in the future. He discovers a planet similar to Earth that has two major oceans. Ocean A is very large and looks like it has baseball s

What is the product of (6x – y)(2x – y + 2?

At what stage of a trial does a defendant plead guilty or not guilty? bond hearing arraignment sentencing jury selection

My home is on the peaked sea-mark of Ithaca under Mount Neion's wind-blown robe of leaves, in sight of other islands—Dulichium, Same, wooded Zacynthus—Ithaca

The thermostat in a refrigerator filled with cans of soft drinks malfunctions and the temperature of the refrigerator drops below zero celcius. The contents of

Which is another way to write 42+63

60 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST IF ANSWERED WITH EXPLANATION _____ produce and secrete antibodies. macrophages phagocytes B lymphocytes T lymphocytes

For a polygon with n sides, 180(n - 2) will give the sum of the ____ angles.

On march 1, year 1, roland doe bought 200 shares of gummit stock at $40 per share. on april 1, year 2, roland sold short (sold without delivering) 100 shares of

Explain why water has a higher boiling point than carbon iv oxide and the two are simple molecular structures

fabulous4tune fabulous4tune · Answer 1 · 2020-03-04T09:46:22+01:00

Answer:

A. Contracts of an intoxicated person are voidable by the intoxicant if the other party had reason to know that because of the intoxicated person's condition, that person was unable to understand the nature and consequences of the transaction or was unable to act in a reasonable manner in relation to the transaction.

Explanation:

According to the restatements of contracts, section 16. It states that contracts entered into by an intoxicated person are voidable by the intoxicant if the other party had reason to know that because the condition of the intoxicated person, the individual was unable to understand the nature and consequences of the transaction or is unable to act in a reasonable manner in respect to the transaction.

Therefore, the contract is as a result rendered voidable and of no legal value.