According to the ruling in New York Times v. United States, which best describes what the government had to prove for its
censorship of the New York Times to have been acceptable?
The articles would have had to indisputably threaten national security
The articles would have had to be harshly critical of the military.
The articles would have had to reveal classified information
The articles would have had to support the enemy in wartime.

Question

01-04-2020
History

contestada

According to the ruling in New York Times v. United States, which best describes what the government had to prove for its
censorship of the New York Times to have been acceptable?
The articles would have had to indisputably threaten national security
The articles would have had to be harshly critical of the military.
The articles would have had to reveal classified information
The articles would have had to support the enemy in wartime.

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Look at the figure, which shows a newspaper headline from the late 1800s. The headline shows how newspapers used yellow journalism to -sell more copies. -

15. What are two factors that probably helped isolate Russia from Western Europe? (1 point) the Cyrillic alphabet and Olga’s selection of the Byzantine Church

what is the main purpose of a thesaurus

GEOMETRY HELP: a.) leg b.) base c.) hypotenuse d.) vertex

Energy flows from the producer level to the _____ level

simplify the expression and explain each step . 4(3x+2)-2

What is the voice in w text?

in bitterness and sadness, I watch for my early release what emotion do these lines of poetry refer to in the end? a: hope b: anger c: confusion d: happiness

You are considering an investment for which you require a 14 percent rate of return. the investment costs $61,900 and will produce cash inflows of $26,000 for t

Dr. russell did a study that found that praise provided by supervisors is associated with higher levels of work productivity only because more motivated employe

jacknjill jacknjill · Answer 1 · 2020-04-09T06:43:02+02:00

The articles would have had to indisputably threaten national security best describes what the government had to prove for its censorship of the New York Times to have been acceptable.

Option: A

Explanation:

The ruling between New York and United States were unconstitutional at great extent. There were contradiction in the majority of issues. In this case the freedom of public was extended and the power of government reduced at its level. Press got sufficient freedom to act accordingly whereas the power of government for interrupting press was seized.

Government had to prove for its censorship of the New York Times the articles would have had to indisputably threaten national security. In this way the censorship would be acceptable.

ogorwyne ogorwyne · Answer 2 · 2021-12-15T14:03:19+01:00

In the New York Times V. the United States, the US would have had to describe that the The articles would have had to indisputably threaten national security.

Whatever is capable of threating national security can be censored justifiably.

The reason why this would be accepted is due to the importance of peace tranquility and unity in a nation.

If the article that the New York Times released was something that could affect the security of the nation, then the government did everyone a favor by censoring it.

Read more on the censorship here: https://brainly.com/question/10943406?referrer=searchResults