Answer:
Peter Funt claimed that hard copies of memories were being replaced by digital versions and that this is not a good development. To him, hard copies were better ways to preserve memories because they had a personal touch.
Explanation:
In his article titled, "Does Anyone Collect old Emails?" Peter Funt fondly remembered his mother who had a penchant for collecting or curating hard copies of documents and letters throughout her life. He also had the same practice while growing.
He lamented that the practice of storing memories in prints was going out of fashion and this was not a good development as the physical ways of storing memories were more meaningful, had a personal touch to them, and had more benefits psychologically.
The claim of "Does Anyone Collect Old Emails?" by Peter Funt is that the fact that the hard copies of memories were replaced by digital versions wasn't a good development.
In the article "Does Anyone Collect Old Emails?", the author remembered how his mother usually collected copies of letters and documents. This was fun to the author.
When he grew up, the hard copies of memories were gradually replaced by digital versions as people now sent emails, etc. This wasn't fun to him anymore.
He noted that storing memory in prints weren't common anymore. This was not a good development because he believed the physical ways of storing memory have a personal touch, unlike the new, modern method.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/11540606
