CAN SOMEONE EXPLAIN WHAT THIS MEANS: (my friend sent this to me but I don’t understand). friendly reminder that your distaste for Lin is inextricable from an ebulliently innumerable conceptualisation of cromulent idiomic value constructed not of an experiential cromulence but a kind of apoplectic braggadocio and it's very telling.

we need to tactfully abrogate and dispel the notion that a woman should be free from miniscule mishaps like imo the aggrandized criticism where antithesis albums have been met with acclamation is very telling of years-cultivated and bred misogyny. this isnt hard to comprehend.

like a majority of the criticism is just circumlocution of misogyny that embiggens the ego of the average man who cogitates that because he is a man he is ultimately superior, therefore displaying supercilious behavior that he thinks is cromulent by societal standard

Respuesta :

Answer:

uh

Explanation:

Something this complicated and intricate is hard to find the message of, but, the first paragraph is saying that we need to stop the idea of women needing to be free of any small problems, and i think the second one means that the large egos of some men are due so because the societal standard and idea of what a manly man should be requires them to act this way to be seen as a man.

Note: My translation is not guaranteed to be correct. This is just the best I can do.