Research results do not prove hypotheses because inductive reasoning is based on probabilities, not proof.
Inductive reasoning can be defined as a process that involves drawing and arriving at a general conclusion (conjecture), especially by critically observing a pattern that's based on a sequence, probabilities, or specific instances.
In Science, a hypothesis is primarily considered to be a tentative or an educated guess and it can be defined as a testable explanation for an observation or a specific experimentation (scientific) problem, especially by using the "if . . . then . . . because" format..
In this context, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that research results do not prove hypotheses because inductive reasoning is based on probabilities, not proof.
Read more on hypothesis here: https://brainly.com/question/146342
#SPJ1
