The conflict between rationalism and empiricism has been interpreted to be about how much of our quest for understanding the outside world is dependent on experience.
It's common to think of experience as having two different types: reflective experience, which includes conscious awareness of our mental processes, and sense experience, which involves our five senses that are focused on the outside world. The difference between the two is primarily determined by their respective objects: while knowledge of external objects can be acquired through sense experience, knowledge of our own minds must be attained through awareness of our own mental processes. This distinction is frequently overlooked in the debate between rationalism and empiricism.
learn more about empiricist philosophers here:
https://brainly.com/question/5615670
#SPJ4
