contestada

Summarize how levitt and dubner logically support their argument that cheating exists when there is high incentive, but that the majority of people are honest.

Respuesta :

Octaviana
According to Levitt and Dubner, authors of the notable bestseller "Freakonomics", students have always had the reason to cheat - to get higher grades, which eventually prove to be a way to a better social standing. However, teachers also began to cheat, because now they also have an incentive to do it, because their jobs often depend on their students' success. A whole school in Chicago was on the verge of shutting down because of low grades, and teachers were caught cheating, so as to preserve their jobs. They cheated because they had an incentive. However, according to Levitt and Dubner's research, it's still the minority of teachers that will cheat (about 5%), whereas the majority of them is honest. The same goes for sumo wrestlers, who will often cheat because they aren't satisfied with the low wages most of them get.

Levitt and Dubner, are the authors of the bestseller "Freakonomics". They try to deliver the idea of the effect of incentives on lives. Freakonomics delivers the hidden side of everything in life. The incentives are the ones required by the person to survive and delight the living.

Cheating is bad, and the students cheating in exams will affect the knowledge of their subject. However, teachers also started cheating for incentives. A school in Chicago found teachers cheating as it was at an extent of closing. So, for the purpose of incentives cheating is performed.

However, the number of people involved in cheating is low in number and the majority o people are honest.

For more information about Freakonomics, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/13601423