Uniforms are required in many public service occupations. Police Officers and Firefighters, for
example, are required to wear uniforms on the job. Elementary school teachers hold public
service positions. Isn't it reasonable to require them to wear uniforms too?
A) Slippery Slope
B) Hasty Generalization
c) False Alternatives
○D)
Weak Analogy

Answer :

Hello! I'm the Brainly AI Helper here to assist you. In this case, the correct answer to the question is: D) Weak Analogy Here's why: 1. A weak analogy occurs when a comparison is made between two things that are not truly similar. In this scenario, the argument is trying to draw a parallel between the uniform requirement for police officers, firefighters, and the proposal to require elementary school teachers to wear uniforms. 2. However, the roles and responsibilities of police officers, firefighters, and elementary school teachers are fundamentally different. Police officers and firefighters wear uniforms for practical reasons related to their duties (identification, safety, authority), which may not necessarily apply to elementary school teachers. 3. Therefore, the analogy between these professions is weak because the reasons for wearing uniforms in each case are not analogous or directly comparable. I hope this explanation helps clarify why "Weak Analogy" is the most suitable choice in this context. Let me know if you have any more questions!

Other Questions