Do you agree or disagree with the Supreme Court’s majority ruling in Yarborough v.Alvarado? Write a short paragraph describing your answer and connect the case to the Miranda v. Arizona decision.

I think that Michael Alvarado's conviction should have been overturned, not upheld by the Supreme Court. Even though he was not told he was under arrest or in custody, his belief that he was in custody was reasonable. This was especially true given his age. Therefore, he was entitled to his Miranda rights and should have been read his Miranda warning.

Answer Link

nikitavidya0 nikitavidya0 · Answer 2 · 2021-10-25T16:24:13+02:00

No, the Supreme Court’s majority ruling should not be accepted.

Alvarado who was a minor and under police custody was stated not official by the state's court. However, the Supreme court overturned this order and said that the minor was arrested by the police for interviewing Miranda's case.

However, the minor believed that he was in custody and would have confessed under pressure. Hence, Miranda rights give permission to suspect to be silent if suspected by the police.

It is similar to Miranda v. Arizona as there also perpetrator was not considered official in the police custody when the records of confession stated.

Therefore, made the court reject the order that the detained minor is a criminal as no attorney rights were provided before the police investigation.

Learn more about Yarborough v.Alvarado here:

https://brainly.com/question/19769368