Read this example.

Wendy was assigned to write a literary analysis of the article "Old Enough,” by Dolores Salamon. In the article, the author argues that the voting age should be lowered from eighteen to sixteen. Wendy believed the author’s argument that sixteen-year-olds are just as mature and responsible as eighteen-year-olds was logical and convincing. Wendy believed the author’s examples of sixteen-year-olds having the responsibility of being students, having jobs, and in some states holding drivers’ licenses were valid points.

Wendy’s thesis statement for her literary analysis is "Salamon effectively details that sixteen-year-olds have just as many responsibilities as older teens, who are often working students.”

Which choice best describes Wendy’s thesis statement?

A.Wendy’s thesis needs revision because it contains details about the topic.

B.Wendy’s thesis is acceptable because it contains quotations about the topic.

C.Wendy’s thesis needs revision because it expresses a position that cannot be proven with text evidence.

D.Wendy’s thesis is acceptable because it expresses a viewpoint and has text evidence.

This is the best proof. Because if it is a study, it means that it is proof and unbiased. The first option is biased because you are participating in the campaign. The second option has nothing to do with the reason for voting at 16 as it only sees adults. The last option is irrelevant because of different cultures and people aged 16 years. These parts in the thesis are acceptable as wendy proofed that sixteen-year-olds have the responsibility of being students, having jobs, and in some states holding drivers’ licenses are a valid point so the voting age should be changed.

Learn more :

https://brainly.com/question/7434700?referrer=searchResults