Respuesta :
In all honesty, I really don’t think that the outcome of the Korean War has been different had General MacArthur not been fired. I wouldn’t think so because the Chinese already entered into combat a really long time before General MacArthur was fired. However, it basically was General MacArthur’s fault that the Chinese entered into the war. If General MacArthur was not fired, then he probably would cause more issues.
Five-Star American General Douglas MacArthur was actually allocated to be leading the United Nations’ troops by President Harry S. Truman. President Truman's objective was to refurbish harmony in Korea, meaning both North and South Korea, as quickly as possible. He, meaning President Truman, never really wanted to provide the Chinese a motive to start combat. President Truman literally told General Douglas MacArthur to not to cross the Chinese border, but MacArthur did not listen to President Truman and crossed the Chinese border anyway.
To be honest, despite the fact some of my peers actually liked General MacArthur’s actions, the leader’s actions that I find more justifiable and reasonable would be President Truman’s. I probably would choose President Truman’s over General MacArthur’s is mainly because President Truman explicitly commanded General MacArthur to not go and cross China’s border. However, General MacArthur crossed China’s border even though he was told not to, which actually caused China to come into the war and this would actually make it longer than it should actually have been.
Five-Star American General Douglas MacArthur was the United Nations troop’s leader. General MacArthur actually decided to take some of the United Nation troops to attack North Korea’s forces, which actually surrounded the North Koreans between both the troops that General MacArthur decide to take and the United Nations’ forces on the front-lines. General MacArthur actually also wanted to annex China so they can regenerate China into a democratic, political system.
Five-Star American General Douglas MacArthur was actually allocated to be leading the United Nations’ troops by President Harry S. Truman. President Truman's objective was to refurbish harmony in Korea, meaning both North and South Korea, as quickly as possible. He, meaning President Truman, never really wanted to provide the Chinese a motive to start combat. President Truman literally told General Douglas MacArthur to not to cross the Chinese border, but MacArthur did not listen to President Truman and crossed the Chinese border anyway.
To be honest, despite the fact some of my peers actually liked General MacArthur’s actions, the leader’s actions that I find more justifiable and reasonable would be President Truman’s. I probably would choose President Truman’s over General MacArthur’s is mainly because President Truman explicitly commanded General MacArthur to not go and cross China’s border. However, General MacArthur crossed China’s border even though he was told not to, which actually caused China to come into the war and this would actually make it longer than it should actually have been.
Five-Star American General Douglas MacArthur was the United Nations troop’s leader. General MacArthur actually decided to take some of the United Nation troops to attack North Korea’s forces, which actually surrounded the North Koreans between both the troops that General MacArthur decide to take and the United Nations’ forces on the front-lines. General MacArthur actually also wanted to annex China so they can regenerate China into a democratic, political system.
pls give me brainliest <3 hope this helps!
1. How did General Douglas MacArthur react to the events in Korea? What was his stance on the Korean War?
- MacArthur was allocated to be leading in the United Nations troops by President Harry S Truman. President Truman’s objective was to refurbish harmony in Korea meaning both North and South Korea as quickly as possible. Under no circumstances did Truman want to give the Chinese a reason to enter the war. He wanted MacArthur to stay away from the Chinese border. Instead of following Truman's orders, MacArthur did things his way. He thought that the Chinese would not join in the war, so he assured Truman that the Chinese army would not take part in the war when the UN forces reach the Yalu River, the border between China and North Korea.
2. How did President Truman respond to the events in Korea? What was his stance on the Korean War?
- President Truman assigned General MacArthur as leader of the UN troops. Truman's overall objective was to create harmony between North and South Korea as soon as possible. He was concerned of the Chinese army joining in the war in favor of North Korea, but MacArthur assured him that the Chinese would not interfere when they reach the Yalu River; however, he was wrong. Because MacArthur disobeyed the orders, Truman relieved MacArthur of his position.
3. Which leader's actions were the most justifiable—General McArthur's or President Truman's? Support your claim with evidence from the lesson.
- President Truman's actions should be more justifiable. McArthur disobeyed orders and made the war much more deadly than it was originally. The idea of Truman was to find a political diplomatic way to resolve the conflict while McArthur wanted to fight and even involve China in the war and Truman knew how dangerous it would be to involve China.
4. Would the outcome of the Korean War have been different had General MacArthur not been fired? Why or why not? Support your claim with evidence from the lesson.
- No, I do not believe that the outcome of the Korean War would have been different because the Chinese had already entered the war long before MacArthur was fired and it was MacArthur’s fault that the Chinese had even entered the war. MacArthur probably would have just made even more of a mess if he hadn’t been fired.
