gonzalezchris16
contestada

Which statement is true?
O
A. U.S. Dollar Diplomacy in Latin America was often accompanied by
military intervention.
O
B. U.S. Dollar Diplomacy meant that U.S. businesses had no power in
Latin America
O
C. U.S. Dollar Diplomacy was never effective in Latin America.
O
D. U.S. Dollar Diplomacy in Latin America meant that the United
States would never use military force.

Respuesta :

Of all the option given about the dollar diplomacy of United States, the correct answer is “U.S. Dollar Diplomacy in Latin America was often accompanied by military intervention”.

Answer: Option A

Explanation:

The Dollar Diplomacy of United States was all about foreign policy which aided for the creation of stability promoting the American interest in commerce over the globe through China and West Africa.

But the foreign policy was intervened with military intervention accompanying to the Latin America. The dollar diplomacy failed to create the stability in commercial interest with the failure of aim to abandon the military intervention from the Latin America in due course of revolutionary times.

jaydaabrahamson231

Answer:

A. U.S. Dollar Diplomacy in Latin America was often accompanied by

military intervention.

Explanation:

APEX Hope this helps

Otras preguntas